I discovered Scarlett Thomas’ books through fellow book blogger Bina from If You Can Read This, who recommended Thomas’ ‘PopCo’. I read ‘PopCo’ and loved it. Then I got to know about Thomas’ ‘The End of Mr.Y’ from Bina’s review of it. I got the book and read the first chapter and found it quite fascinating. I kept it for a rainy day, but the book ended up being in my shelf and spending a quiet life there. (It has been exactly a year since I got the book which is a really uncanny coincidence!) Then more recently I read a review by Steph from Steph and Tony Investigate, and Steph gushed about the book. It tempted me to get the book from the shelf and read it immediately. Then Jo from Bibliojunkie said that she was planning to host a readalong for this book, and I couldn’t resist joining in. I finished reading it yesterday, and I loved it. Here is what I think.
What I think
‘The End of Mr.Y’ is about Ariel Manto who is doing her Ph.D in thought experiments, with specific focus on a Victorian writer called Thomas Lumas and his book ‘The End of Mr.Y’, which is mysterious book which seems to carry a curse with it and no known copy of this book is available. Her guide Saul Burlem disappears from the university one day and no one knows what has happened to him. Ariel is not assigned a new guide though, and she continues doing her research in her original area of interest. Then one day one of the buildings in her campus collapses, because the tunnel which runs below the building collapses. Ariel walks home and while doing that she ends up in a second-hand bookshop. After browsing for sometime, she asks the bookshop assistant whether they have any of Thomas Lumas’ books. Ariel is in luck. The bookshop assistant shows her a box which is filled with books of Lumas. And, surprise, surprise, it has ‘The End of Mr.Y’! Ariel reads it and discovers that it shows a way to travel to a different reality where one can enter the minds of others. But for doing this one needs a concoction and the page which describes this concoction is missing. By this time, Ariel is obsessed with the idea of entering other’s minds and tries to search for the concoction. By luck, she finds the torn page in one of Burlem’s books in his room. Then she reads on how to make the concoction and travels to a different reality. While in this alternate reality, Ariel discovers that there are villains chasing her, who seem to want to either kill her or know the secret of the concoction from her. The adventures she has in this alternate reality, the people she meets, the creatures she helps, the people who save her, how she falls in love, the secrets she finds about Burlem and Lumas and the real world and what she does to save the world form the rest of the story.
I loved ‘The End of Mr.Y’. I loved it first because of the underlying concept – that one can travel to an alternate reality and travel to other people’s minds and travel across time through those minds. And one can do that by having a simple concoction – how awesome is that! In some ways this book reminded me of the movies which have stories based on getting into an alternate reality by connecting oneself into a machine or through a video game - like ‘The Matrix’, ‘eXistenZ’, ‘The Game’ and ‘Tron’. Even ‘Avatar’. I also loved the book because of the way Scarlett Thomas makes concepts like deconstruction, poststructuralism, the existence of God, Big Bang Theory, Theory of Relativity, Four dimensional Spacetime, the Mobius Strip, Quantum Mechanics, the Uncertainty Principle, Homeopathy and the works of people like Einstein, Heisenberg, Derrida, Baudrillard and Samuel Butler accessible to the general reader, without oversimplifying the complexity. I discovered this aspect of Thomas’ writing while reading ‘PopCo’ where Thomas takes the reader into mathematics and cryptography, and in ‘The End of Mr.Y’, Thomas goes even further and covers a wide range of subjects. I think that is a wonderful strength of the book. However, if one is not used to reading about a lot of science or philosophy in a novel, this might put off some readers. It worked for me wonderfully though.
What follows is probably a spoiler. But I couldn’t resist discussing about this. So, if you are planning to read this book, please be forewarned.
One of the interesting things that I learnt from the book was how if we assume that the Big Bang Theory is correct (which most scientists think is), then there should either be a God or there should be many worlds / universes with parallel realities. I haven’t heard of this interpretation before and it made me think. The logic behind this interpretation goes like this : one of the interpretations of quantum mechanics says that a subatomic particle doesn’t exist in a particular position or in a particular state, till an observer sees it. It is supposed to exist in what scientists call a ‘Collapsible Wave Function’ – having many forms at the same time. When an observer sees it, the subatomic particle takes up a particular state, position and has a particular velocity. The effect of observation by an observer, determines all these things. This is supported by quantum mechanics and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle and has been proven by experiments. The Big Bang Theory says that in the beginning the universe was small like a subatomic particle and had infinite mass, which was called a singularity. Then it exploded into the Big Bang and has become the universe as we know it. The argument goes that this subatomic particle-like-singularity would have existed as a collapsible wave function and for it to explode or assume a position or a state or a velocity, an external observer should have observed it. This observer could probably be God. I found this explanation quite interesting, because I haven’t heard of it before. This seems to be the strongest supporting argument for the existence of God that I have read. Are the religious guys listening?
The alternate explanation says that a subatomic particle doesn’t exist as an unresolved wave function before it is observed, but it exists in different states in parallel universes. When an observer observes it, he / she sees one of the states. So at the time of the Big Bang, the primordial subatomic particle, the singularity existed in many different states in different universes, and when it exploded, it resulted in many parallel universes at the same time.
From the little I know, scientists avoid questions on what happened before the Big Bang or how it came about (by saying that time didn’t exist before the Big Bang, which I feel is a totally unsatisfying explanation and a cop out) and try to not talk about the ‘Many Worlds / Universes’ interpretation. To prove logically that either one of two controversial possibilities has to exist, was quite something to me. I need to read more on this.
There is also a lot of roaring sex in the book, which one expects from a typical Scarlett Thomas novel now. Thomas is also not afraid of using four-letter words and while some readers might find this a bit off-putting, Thomas seems to say implicitly that she can write about such things as well as anyone else.
I didn’t know how to react to the ending of the story – Scarlett Thomas herself says this about the ending : “Ian (Stewart) warned me that because of its epilogue, this novel could be read as a ‘shaggy God story’. In the end, I decided to risk it and left it in.” I am not able to say whether the ending is happy or sad – maybe it was bittersweet. It reminded me of the endings of Stanley Kubrick’s ’2001 : A Space Odyssey’ and Darren Aronofsky’s ‘The Fountain’. If you liked the endings of these movies, you will love the ending of ‘The End of Mr.Y’ too.
I made a list of things that I want to do, after I read ‘The End of Mr.Y’. This list has these items right now :
- Read Scarlett Thomas’ ‘Our Tragic Universe’
- Read ‘Flatland : A Romance of Many Dimensions’ by Edwin Abbot
- Explore on the Big Bang and the Many Worlds theory
- Read a VSI or a graphic novel introduction to Derrida
- Explore some of the works of Samuel Butler
Other reviews
Here are links to other reviews of ‘The End of Mr.Y’ that I liked. I have borrowed the idea of providing excerpts from reviews, from other bloggers – Thanks for the inpsiration, friends!
Bina’s Review - “The End of Mr. Y, like PopCo, is mainly a novel of ideas. Sure, the plot moves fast enough, but Thomas throws in wild mix of topics ranging from Derrida to quantum physics. This is the part I loved best, Thomas has the ability to explore complex ideas but still keep the action going…The quest for reality, God and love spans the whole novel. The beginning is a quick introduction to the relevant thinkers and theories, and with then really gains momentum with Ariel’s travel to the Troposphere. From then on you can never be quite sure what is real and what is not; there is the novel within the novel, a reality within reality, and there is so much talk about thought experiments that no one can miss that novel one is holding is one big thought experiment in itself. As Ariel says, “let me become part of a book”.”
Steph’s Review - “Most of the objects of my Sapphic affection tend to be these really brilliant brainy ladies (who have kick-ass senses of humor), so it should come as no surprise that I am now inducting Scarlett Thomas into my club of “Women I Would Go Gay For”…I really love the way Thomas infuses her novels with philosophy and physics…, how she isn’t afraid to tackle big questions and intellectually demanding concepts. In this book there was this whole discussion on the concept of multiple universes and how it relates to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics that kind of just blew my mind in the very best possible way. It is really gratifying to find an author who is not only convinced that her readers are capable of intense thought and contemplation but practically demands that of them.”
Jo’s Review - “I am attracted to this book because of its cover. Nothing else…One of the things that put me off about the book though was that it was rude and shocking at parts…I like the fact that the book is indeed ambitious, ingenious and abstract that makes me as a reader, thinks about the relationships between all those complex ideas introduced. Scarlett Thomas is a writer in her own league and I admire her for that.”
Jenny’s Review - “As a thought experiment it was extremely interesting; as a story it was also quite interesting, and I enjoyed it in both capacities. Though I will say that in its capacity as a story (leaving out its thought-experiment-ness), the longish expository segment with Ariel and Lura and Burlem was very – well. Longish. And very very expository. Distressingly so. I used up a lot of my brain paying attention to it and forgot all about the story.”
Leeswammes’ review - “The solution of why certain scientific discoveries have been made was interesting, very clever…There was a lot of scientific discussion, a bit too much for me. Luckily, I have an interest in popular science and most of what was discussed wasn’t new to me. I can imagine that some people might find this slow to read and hard to understand. In the end, I did enjoy reading the book and when I closed it I was satisfied that I’d read a good book.”
If you like an intellectual novel bursting with ideas, you will love ‘The End of Mr.Y’.

I enjoyed reading your review and especially the scientific parts… more so than in the book, because you summarise it so nicely. I agree that there are some very clever things in this book, such as god as an observer of the Big Bang. And I also think scientists should explain what happened before the Big Bang!
Glad to know that you liked the review, Leeswammes
I found the idea of God being the observer of the Big Bang, quite interesting and new-to-me! I read a book some time back, called ‘Science and Religion : A Very Short Introduction’ by Thomas Dixon, which was about the conflicts between science and religion across the centuries. It had most things on the subject like creationism, evolution, intelligent design, but I don’t remember this idea (God being the observer…) being discussed in that.
Somehow I don’t enjoy reading about religion so I tend to stay away from books like you mention. I do wonder though, if Scarlett Thomas was the first to come up with the idea of God as observer.
It will be interesting to find out whether Scarlett Thomas was the first to come up with that idea
I don’t think Scarlett Thomas was the first. I’m the same way I don’t like to read “God” stuff in my literature, but I remember having a mandatory class in modern philosophy and we had a few classes discussing all the arguments for God and one of them, not Thomas’s (I can’t remember whose! (probably because I blocked it)) discussed that things exist because they are being perceived. We know that the world is still there when we go to sleep and are not perceiving it, so there must be a bigger presence (God) who is perceiving.
Thanks. It sounds like the idea isn’t new then, although your class discussed it in a different way.
That is really interesting, Linda! I need to read that philosophy book
[...] Vishy’s review: I discovered this aspect of Thomas’ writing while reading ‘PopCo’ where Thomas takes the reader into mathematics and cryptography, and in ‘The End of Mr.Y’, Thomas goes even further and covers a wide range of subjects. I think that is a wonderful strength of the book. However, if one is not used to reading about a lot of science or philosophy in a novel, this might put off some readers. It worked for me wonderfully though. Comments [...]
Love your review, Vishy, and that you are so enthusiastic about the book!
Your list looks similar to mine, though I still haven’t really started on it. Maybe after uni.
There’s a lot of amazing stuff in TEoMY, and some of it is not so great, but I love that Thomas invariably leaves one with the urge to research (which rhymes, yay)
Glad to know that you liked the review, Bina! Thanks for introducing Scarlett Thomas’ books
I am so glad you enjoyed this one! And I completely agree with you on the whole Big Bang Theory = God or multiple universes thing being soooo cool. That was one of my favorite parts of the book, to be honest, in part because that whole conversation/discussion kind of just blew my mind.
I still have to read PopCo, but I’m really looking forward to it. And then I think I will re-read Our Tragic Universe because Thomas’s books are so deep and rich that one read-through just isn’t enough!
Thanks for gushing about ‘The End of Mr.Y’, Steph
It nudged me to read the book. Hope you enjoy ‘PopCo’. I loved it! I want to read ‘Our Tragic Universe’ now.
I had mixed feelings about the book as a whole, but I love that cover. It’s so shiny! It makes me want to collect all three of Thomas’s books just so I can have all the shininess on my bookshelves.
Glad to know that you like the cover, Jenny! It will be nice to collect the three books by Thomas for their covers
I have got two now – I need to get ‘Our Tragic Universe’.
I love the idea of a book that guides you to other books and new concepts.
For me this is the best kind of reading. Usually this happens to me when I read non-fiction, it’s quite rae that fiction touches on so many philosophical themes.
I got some Derrida here. It’s great to read about him but he is not very accessible.
I also like the idea of being able to travel to someone else’s mind.
Glad to know that you liked the look of the book, Caroline. I really liked it for the references to different topics it makes, inspiring the reader to explore more in those areas. Sorry to know that Derrida is not very accessible – I was hoping to read some of his works. Maybe I should find a Dummies guide to Derrida
You read a lot of books I’ve never heard of, Vishy! It’s good to be introduced to new things. I was particularly interested in the Big Bang part, because it’s something that’s always fascinated me. That interpretation is new to me, but definitely worth thinking about!
Glad to know that you liked the review and this particular interpretation of the Big Bang, Andrew! Hope you get to read this book and like it.
What a thorough and enthusiastic review! I love how you came to finally read the book. It seemed the universe WANTED you to read it. And I love how you excerpted other reviews by bloggers. I did skip the spoiler section in case I end up reading it (which is a distinct possibility.) How can I not be intrigued by a book with rollicking sex scenes AND all those story elements?
Thanks Jenners
Glad to know that you liked the review. Hope you get to read this book and like it. I will look forward to hearing your thoughts on it.
It sounds great! It is great when a book picks up a gushing blogging following! I always thinks htat’s a great recommendation
Glad to know that you like the description of the book, Sarah. Would love to hear your thoughts if you get to read it.
I was very happy to hear that you loved it, as I own a copy and have been meaning to get to it
I skipped over the spoilers but can’t wait to read your full thoughts when I’m done.
Glad to know that you have ‘The End of Mr.Y’ on your ‘TBR’ list, Ana. Hope you get to read it soon and enjoy it. Can’t wait to hear your thoughts on it
I read Skippy Dies (Paul Murray) in the last few days and that also has some interesting science. Not as brilliant as in The End of Mr Y, it’s more schoolboy science, but still quite good fun.
Nice to know that, Judith
I will add ‘Skippy Dies’ to my ‘TBR’ list. Thanks for telling me about this.
[...] ‘The Marriage Plot’ by Jeffrey Eugenides, ‘Possession‘ by A.S.Byatt, ‘The End of Mr.Y’ by Scarlett Thomas and ‘Nothing But You’ edited by Roger Angell were all 500 pages or [...]